Significant theorem on limitless growth possibilities pursued through limits to food production - awareness goes beyond:

<1> Geometric population growth versus arithmetic population growth.
- When growth is in constant proportion ( inclusive of output of agricultural products to feed the population ) versus similarity ( or constant amount ) on quantifyable increase each year ( which proves to occur at a slower pace ) could hasten evidential increase in the eventful gross income. Future productive trends via technology advancement could ' stress ' food production ( limit implied ).

Economists reject often times limits or boundaries to technological capabilities ( real or implied ) . Thus, alternatives or combinations of goods ( refer to food products ) at any given time period could offer more ( instead of a limit ) [a.k.a. Consumption Possibilities]. Example, preservatives formulation and canning technology could revitalize a nation's meat processing ( like corned-beef and canning production. This entails multi-million a year through profit for entrepreneurs on this limitless growth of food production.

Disciplined outlook may pave economic growth within institutional context or stable expectations - accelerated via:

<1> Government policy and perceptions in altering ( changing for improvement ) investment plans ( like infrastructure development projects );

<2> Dedication to long-run fiscal policy leading to long-run fiscal discipline ( like upgrading of technology banking system nation wide projects );

<3> Entrepreneural opportunity to less regulated economies yet more investment opportunity through:
-3.1. Open trade;
-3.2. Secured rights (proprietary ); and
-3.3. Lower regulated taxes. ( like use of platform-based oriented software packages by private firms ).

Economists never try to symphatize with too much hassle created by pressures on a variety of '' known and predictable '' expectations ( which affect A.D. - Aggregate Demand shifts . To effect, certain forms of tax hikes or 'spending cuts' aim to reduce A.D. shifts are to be merged into the vibrant economy. [a.k.a. Fiscal Restraint]. Thus, such needed fiscal policy is easily determined to act as balancing discipline for subsidizing minimal ' disturbances ' to maintain the correct level of Aggregate Demand.

Incremental accreditation to policy levers dependent through factors appreciation via incentives and investments - displayed largely on :

<1> Versatility in increasing ( upgrading ) human - capital allotment.
- Where continuous education to benefiting skills confront American born as well as immigrants
( and foreign - based affording scholars ) uplift the quality of academic work force as an impact to most major companies enriching / profiting on its own.

<2> Extensive application to increasing physical - capital investment (allotment ) .
-2.1. On investment incentives ( partaking ) heavy separation of tax credits for new investments like software trademarks;
-2.2. On savings incentives ( alignment ) inspiring redirection to savings like retirement accounts to long-term investment plans;
-2.3. ON accentuating fiscal schemes ( decision - making policy wholesale demand-supply ignition to private investments where government attack strategy lead to crowding-out spending borrowing scheme ( private sector is thereby lessened / reduced , in effect ).

Economists always play on ' capacity ' estimation. The enticement to any investment and incentives if all matters lead to profit ( not a loss situation ) is being able to acquire more assets - in cash or kind. Hence, banks attain a very fruitful and beneficial reserves on its own.

Frequent blooming or foliation inspires productivity advancement via Research and Development - edificed on:

<1> Management technique enhancements>
- Better management skills from centralization to decentralization.
<2> Innovations on scientific researches.
- Newer standards, acceptance and inclusions.
<3> Production algorithm improvements.
- Better adoption of manpower and machine blending technology.
<4> Stylistic product-conception.
- New inventions to allowable- accepted products in the market.
<5> Variations to new ideas as a seed to new growth theory.
- Widespread of knowledge in training, development and dissemination to the whole manpower ( as well as its customer .

Economists articulate often on their recommendations to expansion within Research and Development scope.
This involves a lot of movement in land, labor, equipment and vital resource dictated by investors/owners as well
as volatile market forces activities. When 1 major airline buys jet planes. The competition through capitalization follows even as a sense and sign of ' challenging ' opportunity costs or inviting customer preferences in the market of jet-setters.

Frequent or not frequent fusion of resources emphasizes the need for management training as one major influence in growth, economically expressed on:

<1> Determinants to quality production.
- Where products are catered for by companies who can dictate their asking prices in the market.
<2> Factors to flausible communications .
- Where employers ( or executives ) talk and bond easily with their laborers ( or rank-and-file ) who could foster good customer relations.
<3> Elements to long term gains ( profits ) .
- Where people act as customers who could expect loyalty as well as faster productivity returns.

Economists consider concentrations to management style of training to strictness as a form of communism. The emphatic training to being involve in short-term outlook as well as non-participation
of workers in the entire management decision making. Fault, then and effectively is caused and attributed to a seemingly stateless attraction to decipher productivity in any labor-management-product relational open market economy (eccentric cash centralization)..

Fastidious and critical exploration of capital-investment for, both aspects of being human-capital and/or physical-capital - assessed through:

<1> Non-consequential productivity averaging.
1.1. People management increase their own skills by constant learning, artificial or real intelligence , being company-sponsored or on their own initiative ( and effort ) , [ Example, Software Advancement];
1.2. Technical and hands-own skills training of tools , machineries, computers, and ' capital-equipments ' where productivity is measured upon the use, actual operation and time management as one major factor of labor productivity. [ Example, CAD/CAM engineering or website production ].

<2> Economists somehow control ( or take charge) on direct or indirect upliftment of people management. Why?
Mainly, because they could imply the need by employers( or companies ) to maximize the M.T.R. - Marginal Tax Rate given ( or taken to ( or from ). The ultimate progression of skills are seen eventually on how future targets on quality and quantity production are achieved. The result that imposed improvements to higher training ( or skills upgrading ) via education and hands-on depends on the growth rate of tax applied as well as each nation's technical expertise.

Safe or unsafe ( sometimes unavoidable ) peculiarities fluctuate and adversaries force mandates in typical growth ( economically ) - applied sources to productive gains comprises:

<1> Management approach and technique - Where allocation for use and consumption into products ( as well as by - product ) are of standard effects;

<2> Elevation to capital elasticity - Where acknowledge fusion of wages, more expensive ( to high quality ) resources are prerogatives rather than an ' excuse ' into norms of business agenda;

<3> Highly classified technology apportionment - Where training is included for use of capital - based machineries and equipments for production upgrade capacity; and

<4> Favorable labor skills - Where ' best fit '' for quality in the expansion to execution of manpower skills are coerced with all management-related input to production.

Economist do agree on any delicate dedication to ' consumer's intention and wants'. This tells entrepreneurs a certain ' demand curve ' for meeting a sensible economic growth ( in general ). Thereby, a stable growth rate of productivity and labor force gives a succeeding growth rate of total output - Hence, acknowledge targets aimed for - could clearly be met and achieved.

Jostled or steady flow of marketable goods or services apply to the attested G.D.P. - Gross Domestic Product - Nominal versus Real - pertinent via:

<1> Simplicity and endurance in the concept of economic growth:
1.1.) Continuous rise in prices in prices of commodities to calculate and keep abreast and in-line with the nominal G.D.P. growing [ similar to inflationary '' attrition '' ]
1.2 ) Avoidance of distorted price activities / fluctuations by reactionary rise substantially of real G.D.P. - refering to the actual quantity produced goods and services. [ Adjustments to changing prices caused by inflation ].

<2> Economists lead a major role of '' imposing '' behavioral patterns to a volatile and active nation's economy. When products like oil and petroleum consumated a one-to-one production capacity - 1 cubic liter per mileage costing an equivalent 99.0 % capacity as well. This means that nominal GDP versus Real GDP are contradicting the anticipated reaction in the open market. Extraordinary ( or nonpareil ) behavior by consumers will cause total and actual production capacity to lower prices instead of ' rising prices' to lessen ( and create ) capability of the nominal GDP. [ Thus, enabling space-to-steadily ' rise ( in turn , )maybe higher than the expected market price ].

Effectual or ineffectual production production capabilities provide long - run changes in capacity - postulated on:

<1> Control of GDP potential on increasing economic growth.
-1.1. Increase accordingly the long-run aggregate supply ( SHIFT to the right). For example, continuous supply of durum wheat by importation automatically cause production capacity of pasta products to rise also in capacity . Thus, economic growth potentially increases also.
-1.2. Increase subsequently the short-run aggregate demand. For example, sudden ' feel ' by consumers to buy products that outsell less quality ones ( LIKE egg_based pasta or spaghetti versus durum wheat ) triggers greater output and employment possibilities, too.

<2> Economists look at versatility of produce markets to be able to calculate any long-run production supply capacity. This imposes a corollary on products on competition which needs exchange rates as in imports versus exports. Likely to be managed, government inter-relate capacity of private enterprises on a threat of existing dirty '' floats'' around ( attempts to tamper a price factor mechanism on a market situation ). Therefore, a well managed system of Exchange Rate over any fluctuations could overcome lessening or changes in investments ( capacity ).

Trade in and trade off sometimes seldom influence the Keynesian behavioral view of the AS - Aggregate Supply ) curve - analyzed on:

<1> Bearing steady AS curve due to:
- 1.1) As Aggregate Demand improved ( increase in sale expectations ) , responding producers increase ( manufacture rise ) their output - inspite of steady ( no increase or same prices in the market;
- 1.2) As full employment capacity is reached or achieved, both Aggregate Demand and output shift respectively affect the AS curve caused by fiscal and monetary policy-makers. Where greater
risks could exist, variations or spills to price inflation occur simultaneously.

<2> Economists attempt to predict (aim to control ) through responses the quality and quantity of goods produced in the open market. The ultimate will of buyers is likely to express their inert capability to consume.[a.k.a demand for money]. Consequential risks - despite constant price [ no fluctuations] never affect buyers. Why? It is because they held back [stop buying in order to save)
and prepare for any better deal , instead.

Serving or deserving motivations could positively push deregulations on product markets - artificially shown via:

<1> Profit procrastination on illusive transportation costs. Government deregulations have passed on:

1.1.) Constraints among producers to meet ( increase ) responses to prevailing demand ; [ limit competition ]
1.2.) Impediments at will emphasized by producers, affected through modes like trucking, interstate bus lines,
or railroads - as facilitation overhead costs (spending) to carry their goods to-and-from the trade center. [ drive-up
transportation costs ].

<2> Economists revamp most of what the products market could offer - at any time, season or demand schedule. However, government which nearing to invade private matters via their deregulations affectionately often incur them extra spending than revenue in itself. If waste does not haste them to act advantageously , budget deficit is to occur
[ even bust open to the public ] . As a remedy, cost should be ' visibly incorporated to producers' - willing to get more competition despite chasing ' wild card ' delivery changes/ costs unto the completion, obviously of a sell-&=buy processes.

Unbiased formula attest to government interventions via influences on its factor market 'deregulation ' - asymptomatic through ':

<1> Match and scratch minimum wages
- Limits of capability and ability of employers of workers are lower paid;
production costs are seduced to increase due to lower paid workers;
training and hiring are likely to take place due to low-skilled workers;
<2> Emancipate mandatory benefits.
- Excessive absences lure and allure workers to avail of them ( for example - Family and Medical Leave Act) which
burden employers to obligate payments due them - affecting ( decrease or shift to the left ) of aggregate supply.

<3> Economists always attempt to protect aggregate supply to lessen by quantity . This is where certain provisions apply to facilitate '' CAPITAL ''. .Positive prone moves like improvement in new plant, better equipment and modern structures affect real-time production processes which could (instead) reverse factor market influences - to favor aggregate supply increase ( rise quantitatively or shift to the right). For example, With abundance on leather or cowhide supply, quality thread supply or quality rubber sole supply - shoe manufacture could raise its production capacity level.

Unassuming reactions and responses by producers create vital impact on shaping the AS - Aggregate Supply curve -
published through:

<1> Facilitating ideal situation into linking policies - both fiscal and monetary, to achieve full employment and also, price stability.
- > This prevents 2 simultaneous ( opposites ) occurences of:
- 1.1. ) Dominance of inflation ( open ended increases on prices of goods ); and
- 1.2 ) Post - mortem unemployment ( closed reaction decisions affecting rates of wages & its increases, as well as
promotions ).

<2> Economists consolidate mix reactions. They poised to consumers on - either spend ( whenever they could afford )
or save ( whatever amount they could allot ). The equivalent interaction to show interest to buy accordingly when prices of goods are ' tempting ' . [a/.k.a. demand shift ]. Automatically push to risen level the supply curve ( or Aggregate Supply ] scenarios of panic buying , seasonal spree are examples of shifts in demand greatly influencing
the AS curve.

Fragmentation and division of complete cycles to explode certain profit prospects derail tax-induced supply shifts - could be due to:

<1> Hyper - effect on supply decisions.
- 1.1. Pushing a low rate for unemployment.
- 1.2. Pushing aside ( almost close to nil ) pressures for inflation.
The first means more work available and the second means more investments or capitalization. Both could mean more income which could provide for additions to tax rates ( induced ) as shifts on supply occurs.

<2> Economists often pay their toll to ' contradictions' on the form of '' not utilized resources ''. When an active market economy is present, profits are also vulnerable for the taking. However, reasons like qualifications -it to the worker - and the - job forbids this. Thus, either imposed tax cuts
or tax rebates conscientiously admonish both public and private sector. The constraints lies ( develops ) on the sourcing of income transfers on a domestic level ( as in societies ' squelching mission ' ). Fairness to the 'equal work, equal pay ' policy becomes the bonding principle towards this cause.

Consequential results should not be anticipated or allowed specially on provisions for '' investments' handling effects of tax incentives - analyzed by:

<1> Not giving - in to requirements of :
1.1. Production - additional investments could cause rise in total output costs ( either per piece or as a wholesale ) ;
1.2. New Equipment - extra investments could initiate extra rate in increase, accountable to additional percentage service ( use of equipment ) rendered; &
1.3. Structure - as in improvement or expansion which leads to additional indirect labor cost rise - likely to be imposed with total manufacturing cost - considered as an impact to changes in business inventories.

<2> Economists often attempt to counter balance any threat for high tax incentives. Even with the input ( or intrusion ) of Federal Revenue to react ( positively ) on changes in National Income ( including benefits/ taxes ). This is known as the Automatic Stablizer. When aggregate supply is stopped ( or restricted to push prices up). Investments are greatly ' burdened by the presence ' of higher tax incentives.

Overlook and control to financial incentives often captivate labor supply - ascertained via:

<1> Influential capability discerened by the options to affect the Marginal tax rate - (M.T.R.).
- If the private sector necessarily accumulate a ' solo ' - minded - manufacture ( or production ) for one basic industry, 2 possible alterations the work force stability happens;
1.1) Rise in M.T.R. decreases ( lessen ) incentive to work - that is, real ( to absolute ) production gets the load increase; and
1.2.) Decrease in M.T.R. increases ( appreciates ) incentive to work - that is, Imaginary ( to virtual or projected ) production takes the 'load decrease '.

<2> Economists always support the ' role player attributed by the work standard quality of auditors, tax specialists or fiscalizers. More often, the public sector through its Federal budget allocated to a ' balancing effect ' lessens the toll of pending schedules for planned projects and ultimately to coresponding wage rate increases. [a.k.a. discretionary
fiscal spending ] . Hence, an effective marginal tax rate becomes a determinant to both Quantified and Qualified work force supply.

Torid attraction gives excitement and inspiration to Today's Macro Economy.

Too much sensitivity on market vector determinant ( supply - side policy ) affects - tax incentives - attributed to:

<1> Opposing levy or regulations to taxes for higher ( rising ) recording of aggregate demand. Relevant to Keynesian economics - whatever plans executed for encouraging more supply ( like extra production of ' common ' brands of clothing for M & F ) in the market in effect denoted equal amount of capital ( $ ) laid - out to compete in the supply-side economics - where in taxes ( either cuts or incentives ) are constructively - applied. [ From procurement of R.M.I. - Raw Materials Inventory - to its scheduled processing - that is - conversion to F.G.I. - Finisthed Goods Inventory ].

<2> Economists apply ' robust - techniques ' to convince management people in exposing liquid assets and convertible assets to profitable use. As more capital is exposed , equivalent expectations to tax ( accumulation ) additions as applicable in supply terms convert easily to additional ( extra ) income for workers ( from Direct Labor ) and serve as multiplying their income quintile ( tripling effect ) . [ Ratios of rise in tax , rise in income and rise in demand - incorporating for added ciompany output ( expansion ) ] .